Timely Articles, News, & Issues on the Family
Friday, leaders representing the broad coalition of Californians who supported Proposition 8 called on leaders of the No on Proposition 8 campaign, in addition to Senator Diane Feinstein and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, to denounce the attacks against citizens who supported the constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.
Introducing Family Leader Network to friends, family and citizens across the country just got a little bit easier. We are taking our new brochure to fairs, conventions and door to door to help like-minded citizens strengthen their communities and states
Family Leader is part of a national coalition called Standing for Marriage which has created a page of helpful articles by specific topic. Here you can find the best articles about same-sex marriage's impact on religious freedom, on society, on children and on the family.
The Democratic Party eagerly pushes hate crimes and gender-orientation "discrimination" legislation through local, state, and national legislatures that threatens the First Amendment rights of pro-family individuals, businesses, and tax-exempt organizations.
In a democracy, the results of a fair election should be respected and no one should be singled out for attack because they are exercising their core civil right to speak, vote, or donate to the cause of their choice.
California voters may have to face the issue of gay marriage again on the 2010 ballot if the state Supreme Court decides to uphold the passage of Proposition 8.
The people have spoken twice in California supporting the traditional definition of marriage—once in 2000 and again this election—but that isn't enough for proponents of same-sex marriage who intend to intimidate and harass until their philosophy triumphs.
Plainly, declining to change the timeless definition of marriage deprives no one of "the civil rights once denied" to blacks, and it is an absurdity to claim otherwise.
Evidence from previous and pending cases indicates that the court tends to take an extremely narrow view of people's "free exercise and enjoyment of religion" when they clash with another group's need for equal protection.
What's at risk in this fight is not the civil rights of homosexuals. What's at risk is religious freedom for every American.
Marriage Advocates: 'We Will Not Be Silenced'Proposition 8 supporters are calling on leaders of the "No on 8" campaign and government officials to denounce the attacks against those who supported California's constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.
Media Have a Proposition for Calif. Churches: You’re BigotsThe liberal media worked overtime against California's marriage amendment, Proposition 8, which the voters passed 52 to 48 percent. Now they are working to elevate angry gay protesters who are vilifying opponents and targeting churches
Legality of Same-Sex Marriage Ban ChallengedThe future of same-sex marriage in the Golden State will rest, once again, in the hands of its highest court. But this time, its fate will hinge on a different question: Can a state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage go before voters? Or must it go before the legislature first?
German Officials Interfere in U.S. Election: Opposing Cal. marriage amendmentGermany's top diplomat in San Francisco has been actively campaigning against a measure to protect marriage. Leaders of 30 U.S. groups are demanding that Germany issue an apology and end its government's interference in U.S. elections.
Catholic Bishop Stuns Natl. Homosexual Ministries Conference with Straight TalkAt the National Association of Catholic Diocesan Lesbian and Gay Ministries conference held in Long Beach, CA, Bishop Jaime Soto stunned the audience by "courageously but gently" giving a clear presentation of Church teaching on sexuality.
More in the NewsroomSame-Sex Marriage: Are the People Sovereign, or is it to be the Courts?
If the CA Supreme Court were to now attempt to nullify what the people have chosen, they will have attempted to usurp the sovereignty of government “of the people, by the people and for the people” and to replace it with government “of the judges, by the judges and for the judges.”